Skip to content

All Updates

3 items today
Sep 3Thu
  1. Federal Register · USITC

    USITC lifts partial suspension of enforcement of remedial orders in photodynamic therapy case as to U.S. Patent No. 11,697,028

    The U.S. International Trade Commission granted a request by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. of Princeton, New Jersey to lift the partial suspension of enforcement of the limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders as to U.S. Patent No. 11,697,028 in the investigation of certain photodynamic therapy systems, components thereof, and pharmaceutical products used in combination with the same. The notice does not state an effective date or identify the products or respondents covered by the remedial orders.

  2. Federal Register · USITC

    USITC declines to review ALJ order adding AnaBio Technologies Unlimited as respondent in coated confectionery probe

    The U.S. International Trade Commission determined not to review an initial determination, Order No. 7, in which the presiding Administrative Law Judge granted the complainant's unopposed motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation in Certain Coated Confectionery Products and Components Thereof. The amendment adds AnaBio Technologies Unlimited Company of Dublin, Ireland, as a respondent and terminates AnaBio Technologies, LTD. of Dublin, Ireland, as a respondent. The notice does not state an investigation number, an effective date or any relief.

Sep 2Wed
  1. Federal Register · USITC

    USITC terminates Section 337 investigation into video-capable computers and displays

    The U.S. International Trade Commission determined not to review an initial determination, Order No. 48, in which the presiding administrative law judge granted a joint motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety based on arbitration agreements. The investigation, covering certain video-capable laptop and desktop computers, handheld computers, tablets, televisions, projectors, and components and modules thereof, is terminated.

  2. Federal Register · USITC

    USITC reviews in part final initial determination in Section 337 mobile electronic devices investigation

    The U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part a final initial determination issued by the presiding Administrative Law Judge in the Section 337 investigation Certain Mobile Electronic Devices, which found a violation of section 337 as to a certain asserted patent and no violation as to other asserted patents. The Commission requests written submissions from the parties on the issues under review, and from the parties, interested government agencies and other interested persons on remedy, the public interest and bonding, under the schedule set out in the notice. The notice does not state the schedule dates, the products or companies involved, or any remedy.

  3. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT rules feed-grade chlortetracycline concentrate is classifiable as an antibiotic under 2941.30.00

    In Slip Op. 26-102, Court No. 22-00056, the U.S. Court of International Trade granted Zoetis Services LLC's motion for summary judgment and denied the government's cross-motion, holding that feed-grade chlortetracycline concentrate manufactured in China by Jinhe Biotechnology Co., Ltd. is properly classified as an antibiotic under subheading 2941.30.00 rather than as an animal feed preparation under heading 2309. CBP had liquidated two Chicago entries, dated December 26, 2019 and January 22, 2020, under subheading 2309.90.10 and assessed Section 301 duties under 9903.88.03 at 25 percent ad valorem; the government argued on cross-motion for subheading 2309.90.95 at 1.4 percent.

  4. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains USITC negative injury determination on aluminum extrusions from 14 countries

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained in full the U.S. International Trade Commission's final negative determination in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of aluminum extrusions from China, Colombia, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and Vietnam, in Slip Op. 26-101, Court No. 24-00209, and denied plaintiffs' motion for judgment on the agency record. The Commission found the domestic industry was neither materially injured nor threatened with material injury by reason of subject imports during the January 2021 to March 2024 period of investigation.

Aug 31Mon
  1. Federal Register · USITC

    USITC institutes Section 337 investigation into certain mobile devices over '369 patent

    The U.S. International Trade Commission instituted an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 on a complaint filed July 28, 2026, as amended August 14, 2026, by GG Technologies, Inc. d/b/a StayTouch of Santa Monica, California. The complaint alleges violations based on the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain mobile devices with hardware and software for exchanging electronic content by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 12,022,369. The complainant requests that the Commission issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order after the investigation.

  2. Federal Register · USTR

    USTR seeks comments and sets public hearing on Russia's WTO commitments

    USTR requests public comments for its annual report to Congress on Russia's implementation of its WTO obligations, with written comments, requests to testify and written testimony due October 1, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. EDT, under Docket Number USTR-2026-0497. USTR will hold a public hearing at its offices at 1724 F Street NW, Rooms 1 & 2, Washington, DC, on October 14, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. EDT.

Aug 26Wed
  1. CBP · Trade

    CBP publishes Rail Electronic Export Manifest final rule requiring advance electronic manifests

    CBP published the Rail Electronic Export Manifest Final Rule on August 26, 2026, requiring advance submission of electronic rail export manifests in the Automated Commercial Environment's Electronic Export Manifest system. The rule makes EEM mandatory for electronic rail manifest processing, moving beyond the current EEM Pilot. The notice does not state an effective date or compliance deadline.

Aug 20Thu
Aug 19Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT denies as moot NRDC motion to enforce MMPA import provisions settlement

    The U.S. Court of International Trade denied as moot the plaintiffs' motion to enforce the settlement agreement in Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Lutnick, Court No. 24-00148, Slip Op. 26-97, dated August 19, 2026, after all parties agreed no live controversy remained. The court noted that the Marine Mammal Protection Act import provisions, 16 U.S.C. § 1371(a)(2), have been implemented for the first time since the MMPA's 1972 enactment, with comparability findings issued for 135 nations covering approximately 2,500 fisheries and import bans on fish caught with commercial fishing technology causing incidental kill or serious injury of ocean mammals in excess of U.S. standards.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's second remand redetermination in UAE circular welded steel pipe review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's Second Remand Redetermination in the 2020-2021 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe from the United Arab Emirates, Slip Op. 26-98, Court No. 23-00113. On remand following the CAFC's decision in Marmen III, 134 F.4th 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2025), Commerce discontinued the Cohen's d test and applied a new three-step differential pricing analysis, revising Universal Tube and Plastic Industries' weighted-average dumping margin from 2.63% to 3.64%. The court also accepted Commerce's explanation for applying both the inter-quarter and same-quarter comparisons in the same review.

  3. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT denies JBF Bahrain summary judgment in US-Bahrain FTA origin dispute

    The U.S. Court of International Trade held in Slip Op. 26-99, Court No. 23-00067, that under HTSUS General Note 30 a third-country input must undergo double substantial transformation to count toward the 35 percent value requirement of the United States–Bahrain Free Trade Agreement, and that the CBP regulation adopting the tariff-shift test in 19 C.F.R. § 10.809(i) is ultra vires and invalid. The court denied JBF Bahrain W.L.L.'s motion for partial summary judgment and granted the government's cross-motion, finding the importer's tariff-shift reading of the regulation wrong in any event because it also requires the tariff shift to occur twice.

Aug 14Fri
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT remands FLETF denial of Camel Group's removal request from UFLPA Entity List

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-95, Court No. 25-00022, remands to the Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force its denial of Camel Group Co., Ltd.'s request to be removed from the UFLPA Entity List, granting in part and denying in part Camel Group's motion for judgment on the agency record. Camel Group, a Shanghai Stock Exchange-listed maker of battery-related products that imports into the U.S., challenged the denial on statutory authority, the definition of goods "out of" the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, and the adequacy of the agency's explanation and evidentiary support. The opinion is dated August 14, 2026, and was issued by Judge Lisa W. Wang.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT denies reconsideration in Tianjin Magnesium AD review of pure magnesium from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade denied Tianjin Magnesium International Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd.'s motion for reconsideration in Court No. 25-00002, Slip Op. 26-96, issued August 14, 2026. The motion challenged the court's March 13, 2026 opinion and order in Tianjin Magnesium I, which sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's final results of the antidumping duty administrative review of pure magnesium from China for the period May 1, 2022, through April 30, 2023. The court found the plaintiffs misread its earlier opinion, conflating Bulgarian export data with production data, and that they failed to show reconsideration was necessary.

Aug 13Thu
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT upholds IEEPA rescission of de minimis exemption, denies Axle summary judgment on Counts I and II

    The U.S. Court of International Trade held in Slip Op. 26-94, Court No. 25-00091, that IEEPA's authority to "nullify [or] void . . . exercising any . . . privilege" authorizes the President's rescission of the de minimis exemption under 19 U.S.C. § 1321, and that the APA does not apply to the ministerial agency actions implementing that directive. The court denied Axle of Dearborn's motion for partial summary judgment on Counts I and II, granted summary judgment to the government on those counts, denied the government's motion to dismiss Count II as moot, and denied the government's motion for summary judgment on Count III.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT denies Chattem intervention in glycine changed circumstances review appeal

    The U.S. Court of International Trade denied Chattem Chemicals, Inc.'s motion to intervene in Salvi Chemical Industries Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 26-02569, Slip Op. 26-93, an action challenging Commerce's final results of the antidumping duty changed circumstances review of the glycine order from China, 91 Fed. Reg. 10,588. The court held Chattem was an interested party as a domestic glycine producer but was not a party to the changed circumstances review, having entered its appearance on June 3, 2026, and that permissive intervention is unavailable in actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c); its June 22, 2026 motion was also untimely.

Aug 12Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's second remand redetermination in phosphate fertilizers countervailing duty review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's second remand redetermination in the countervailing duty administrative review of phosphate fertilizers from the Russian Federation, in Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-92, Consol. Court No. 23-00239, issued August 12, 2026. Commerce reconstructed its tier-three benchmark to include world sedimentary-origin phosphate rock price data from Iran and Togo that had previously been excluded solely on the distinction between igneous and sedimentary ore, and calculated that JSC Apatit received no measurable benefit for the provision of mining rights for less than adequate remuneration, resulting in a total subsidy rate of 22.86 percent ad valorem for the period of review.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT denies ADM motion to complete administrative record in consolidated phosphate case

    The U.S. Court of International Trade denied Archer Daniels Midland Company's motion to complete the administrative record in Consolidated Court No. 23-00239, Slip Op. 26-91, dated August 12, 2026. ADM sought to add its March 30, 2026, Rebuttal Comments in Response to The Mosaic Company's Submission of New Factual Information, which were not in the record because ADM's counsel E-filed them under the first administrative review proceeding rather than the second remand proceeding, so Commerce did not consider them in the remand redetermination.

Aug 11Tue
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT remands Commerce's CVD review determination on Korean cut-to-length steel plate

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-90, Consol. Court No. 24-00190, granted motions for judgment on the agency record filed by Hyundai Steel Company, Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. and the Government of the Republic of Korea and remanded Commerce's final results in the 2022 countervailing duty administrative review of certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate from the Republic of Korea for further explanation or reconsideration.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT remands Commerce denials of Mirror Metals Section 232 steel exclusion requests

    The U.S. Court of International Trade granted Mirror Metals, Inc.'s motion for judgment on the agency record in Court No. 24-00260 and remanded Commerce's denials of its 63 requests to exclude flat-rolled stainless steel products from Section 232 tariffs, in Slip Op. 26-89 dated August 11, 2026. The court found Commerce ignored the regulations' requirements for objections and failed to explain the denials in light of Mirror Metals' rebuttal evidence. The subject steel covers #8 non-directional finish, bright annealed finish and #4 satin finish products; the exclusion requests were filed between October 2022 and March 2024, when the December 14, 2020 exclusion regulations applied.

Aug 10Mon
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT grants partial intervention to vehicle makers coalition in ICON EV EAPA suit

    The Court of International Trade granted in part and denied in part the American Personal Transportation Vehicle Manufacturers Coalition's renewed motion for permissive intervention in ICON EV LLC v. United States, Court No. 26-02759, Slip Op. 26-88, dated August 10, 2026. The Coalition may intervene only to challenge Count III of ICON's complaint, which alleges that CBP imposed interim measures without a reasonable suspicion of evasion under the Enforce and Protect Act, and must file an answer within 14 days of the order.

Aug 7Fri
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT grants steel producers and USW intervention in CORE injury determination challenge

    The U.S. Court of International Trade granted motions to intervene as of right in Kemper AIP Metals, LLC v. United States, Court No. 26-00764, Slip Op. 26-87, allowing Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., Nucor Corporation, Steel Dynamics, Inc., United States Steel Corporation and the United Steelworkers to defend the USITC's final affirmative material injury determination on corrosion-resistant steel products from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, United Arab Emirates and Vietnam. The court held the proposed intervenors had piggyback standing because they seek only affirmance of the determination, the same relief as the government, and qualify as interested parties under 28 U.S.C. § 2631(j)(1)(B).

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT grants Nucor, Steel Dynamics, U.S. Steel and USW intervention in CORE from Brazil AD suit

    The U.S. Court of International Trade granted the motions of Nucor Corporation, Steel Dynamics, Inc., United States Steel Corporation and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC to intervene as defendant-intervenors in Kemper AIP Metals, LLC and Waelzholz Brasmetal Laminação Ltda. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-86, Court No. 26-00762, Judge Timothy M. Reif, dated August 7, 2026.

Aug 5Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains USITC affirmative critical circumstances determination on pea protein from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained the U.S. International Trade Commission's final affirmative critical circumstances determination in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of high protein content pea protein from China, denying the motions for judgment on the agency record filed by importer Nura USA, LLC and by consolidated plaintiffs Jianyuan International Co., Ltd., Shandong Yuwang Ecological Food Industry Co., Ltd., Linyi Yuwang Vegetable Protein Co., Ltd., Yantai Oriental Protein Tech Co., Ltd. and Jiujiang Tiantai Food Co., Ltd. The opinion, Slip Op. 26-85 in Consol. Court No. 24-00182, covers the investigations at Inv.

Jul 29Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce scope ruling on Chinese carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings finished in Vietnam

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's second remand redetermination in the final scope ruling on certain carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings from China, holding that rough fittings produced in China that underwent sizing/reforming or heat- or cold-treating and finishing in Vietnam fall within the antidumping duty order. The ruling covers the two Vietnam production scenarios in the covered merchandise referral, EAPA Consolidated Case Number 7335 (Remand Number 7717), involving Norca Industrial Company, LLC and International Piping & Procurement Group, LP. The court's decision is Slip Op. 26-83 in Consol. Court No. 23-00231, dated July 29, 2026.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains in part and remands in part Commerce's final results in AD review on activated carbon from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's amended final results in the 2022-2023 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain activated carbon from China, Consol. Court No. 24-00262, Slip Op. 26-84, dated July 29, 2026. The court found Commerce's selection of Malaysia as the primary surrogate country unsupported and remanded that issue. The amended final results, at 89 Fed. Reg. 104,978, calculated weighted-average dumping margins of $1.90/kg for Jilin Bright, $1.10/kg for GHC and $1.35/kg for non-selected companies under review.

Jul 27Mon
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce remand redetermination in 2021 softwood lumber AD review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's remand redetermination in the 2021 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain softwood lumber products from Canada, Slip Op. 26-82, Consol. Court No. 23-00187. The remand followed the CAFC's decision in Marmen III, 134 F.4th 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2025), which vacated Commerce's use of the Cohen's d test; Commerce replaced it with a price difference test as the first step of its differential pricing analysis.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains in part and remands in part Commerce's CVD final determination on melamine from Qatar

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-81 dated July 27, 2026, sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's final affirmative countervailing duty determination on melamine from Qatar, 89 Fed. Reg. 97,593 (Dec. 9, 2024), in Court No. 25-00053. The court sustained Commerce's rejection of QAFCO's reconciliation of unreported electricity and water usage at verification, but remanded for reconsideration of the 16% adverse facts available subsidy rate for electricity and water and the benefit determination for land rights. Commerce had calculated 8% ad valorem for electricity, 8% ad valorem for water, and 1.71% ad valorem for certain land rights.

Jul 24Fri
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT remands Commerce's final AD determination on corrosion-resistant steel from Mexico

    The U.S. Court of International Trade remanded Commerce's final affirmative antidumping duty determination on certain corrosion-resistant steel products from Mexico, covering the July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 period of investigation, in Galvasid S.A. de C.V. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-80, Court Nos. 25-00235 and 26-00825. The court held that Galvasid's challenge, filed October 28, 2025, was timely under 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(g)(3)(A)(i) because no binational panel review was requested, and dismissed the later complaint in Court No. 26-00825. Commerce had assigned Galvasid a 24.05% weighted-average dumping margin using partial facts available with an adverse inference, amended to 24.09% after a ministerial error correction.

Jul 22Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT denies Bridgestone's challenge to Commerce's total adverse facts available determination in truck and bus tires from Thailand

    The U.S. Court of International Trade denied Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC's motion for judgment on the agency record and sustained Commerce's final determination in the antidumping duty investigation of truck and bus tires from Thailand, 89 Fed. Reg. 83636 (Oct. 17, 2024). In Slip Op. 26-79, Court No. 24-00263, Judge Gary S. Katzmann found that Commerce's application of total adverse facts available was supported by substantial evidence because the errors in Bridgestone's reporting were pervasive, and that Commerce lawfully corroborated Bridgestone's dumping margin. The court sustained the Final Determination.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains ITC's negative countervailing duty injury determination on glass wine bottles from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained in full the U.S. International Trade Commission's final negative determination in the countervailing duty investigation of glass wine bottles from China, in Slip Op. 26-78, Court No. 24-00199, and denied the U.S. Glass Producers Coalition's motion for judgment on the agency record. The Commission had found the domestic industry was neither materially injured nor threatened with material injury by reason of subject imports. The court held the Commission's findings on price effects, adverse impact and threat of material injury were supported by substantial evidence and in accordance with law.

Jul 21Tue
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's fourth remand results in softwood lumber CVD expedited review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's fourth remand results in the countervailing duty expedited review of certain softwood lumber products from Canada, in Consol. Court No. 19-00122, Slip Op. 26-77, dated July 21, 2026. On remand Commerce reopened the record, netted out C$5,317,890 from the category "Lumber (Unaffiliated Canadian Suppliers) - Resold," and revised D&G/Portbec's overall subsidy rate down to 1.05 percent from 1.75 percent, still above de minimis. The court also upheld Commerce's refusal to deduct secondary processing costs for remanufactured lumber, finding the argument forfeited.

Jul 17Fri
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's third remand results in Saha Thai steel pipe AD review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's Third Remand Results in the 2019-2020 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand, holding that Commerce's application of an adverse inference to the affiliation determination between Saha Thai Steel Pipe Public Company Limited and its home-market customer BNK Steel Co. Ltd. is supported by substantial evidence and in accordance with law. The case is Saha Thai Steel Pipe Pub. Co. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-76, Court No. 21-00627, decided July 17, 2026. The underlying review is the final determination published at 86 Fed. Reg. 69620.

Jul 15Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains ITC's second remand results in phosphate fertilizer injury case

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained the International Trade Commission's second remand results in OCP S.A. v. United States, Consol. Ct. No. 21-00219, Slip Op. 26-75, upholding the Commission's finding that subsidized imports of phosphate fertilizer from Morocco and Russia materially injured U.S. producers. The court held that an agency may disagree with a remand order so long as its conclusions on the remanded issues are supported by substantial evidence, and found the Commission's findings on domestic reshipment capacity, import volume, price effects and causation supported by the record.

Jul 14Tue
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains in part and remands in part Commerce's chlorinated isocyanurates review from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's final results in the antidumping duty administrative review of chlorinated isocyanurates from China for the period June 1, 2022, through May 31, 2023, in Bio-Lab, Inc. v. United States, Court No. 25-00054, Slip Op. 26-74. The court upheld Commerce's determination that Mexico was not at the same level of economic development as China during the period of review and remanded on whether chlorinated isos are unusual or unique merchandise under Policy Bulletin 04.1 and whether calcium hypochlorite and sodium hypochlorite are comparable merchandise for surrogate country selection.

Jul 13Mon
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT denies dismissal and preliminary injunction in challenge to NMFS 2026 comparability findings on New Zealand fisheries

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-73, Court No. 26-02462, denied the government's motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and denied Maui and Hector's Dolphin Defenders NZ Inc.'s motion for a preliminary injunction that would have enjoined NMFS's March 11, 2026 comparability findings and imposed an import ban on New Zealand set net and trawl fisheries. The plaintiff challenges the 2026 Comparability Findings, 91 Fed. Reg. 11,962, as arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law under 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), and alleges the failure to implement an import ban is agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed under 5 U.S.C. § 706(1).

Jul 8Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT dismisses third challenge to CBP denial of customs broker license over CBLE Question No. 27

    The U.S. Court of International Trade granted the government's motion to dismiss in Byungmin Chae v. United States, Slip Op. 26-72, Court No. 26-00788, holding that the plaintiff's third challenge to CBP's denial of credit for Question No. 27 on the April 2018 Customs Broker License Examination is barred by claim preclusion. The opinion, dated July 8, 2026, was issued by Judge Timothy M. Reif. The court found the action arises from the same transactional facts as the earlier litigation, in which the plaintiff's score reached 73.75 percent, below the 75 percent passing score required by 19 C.F.R. § 111.11(a)(4).

Jul 1Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT denies USW challenge to Commerce's AD order on truck and bus tires from Thailand

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-71 dated July 1, 2026, denied the USW's motion for judgment on the agency record in Court No. 25-00004, sustaining Commerce's final affirmative antidumping determination on truck and bus tires from Thailand, 89 Fed. Reg. 83636. The union had argued that Commerce failed to explain why it did not apply an adverse inference to Prinx Chengshan Tire (Thailand) Co., Ltd.'s reporting of financial expenses when calculating the financial expense ratio. The court held that Commerce's decisional path was reasonably discernible and that the determination was supported by substantial evidence and in accordance with law.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT remands Commerce's final determination on brass rod from India over cost adjustments

    The U.S. Court of International Trade granted plaintiffs' motion for judgment on the agency record in American Brass Rod Fair Trade Coalition v. United States, Slip Op. 26-70, Court No. 24-00119, and remanded Commerce's final affirmative less-than-fair-value determination on brass rod from India for further consideration and explanation of adjustments relating to Rajhans Metals Private Limited's cost of manufacturing. The court found Commerce did not reasonably address concerns about the work-in-progress inventory adjustment and the scrap offset methodology. The remand concerns the final determination published at 89 Fed. Reg. 29,300.