Skip to content

#Administrative Review

0 items today
Oct 20Tue
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains in part and remands in part Commerce's CVD remand results on multilayered wood flooring from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-129 in Court No. 23-00136, sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's remand redetermination in the tenth administrative review of the countervailing duty order on multilayered wood flooring from China, for the period of review January 1 through December 31, 2020. Plaintiffs Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. and Riverside Plywood Corporation challenged Commerce's inclusion of non-grade-specific UN Comtrade data in the tier two plywood benchmark and its use of adverse facts available to find certain input suppliers to be government authorities. The court sustained in part and remanded in part the Remand Results.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT reverses its earlier rulings and upholds Commerce's countervailable benefit findings in KG Dongbu Steel case

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-130 in Court No. 22-00047, reversed its conclusions in KG Dongbu I, KG Dongbu II and KG Dongbu III to conform to the Federal Circuit's opinion in KG Dongbu IV, 181 F.4th 1335 (Fed. Cir. 2026), and held that Commerce's reconsideration of the first three equity infusions, its determination of a countervailable benefit and its finding that the benefit passed through on KG Consortium's acquisition were supported by substantial evidence and not contrary to law.

Oct 19Mon
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce remand redetermination of Galvasid dumping margin without adverse facts available

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's remand redetermination in Galvasid S.A. de C.V. v. United States, Court No. 25-00235, in which Commerce found that applying facts otherwise available or an adverse inference was not warranted based on Galvasid's purported failure to report separate freight or insurance revenue in the U.S. market. Judge Jane A. Restani entered the judgment in Slip Op. 26-128 on October 19, 2026, noting that no party submitted comments on the remand results. The judgment does not state the resulting dumping margin or any change to cash deposit rates.

Oct 14Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce redetermination in countervailing duty review of wind towers from Malaysia

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained the Department of Commerce's remand redetermination in the administrative review of the countervailing duty order on utility-scale wind towers from Malaysia, in Court No. 24-00079, Slip Op. 26-126, dated October 14, 2026. Commerce kept its use of the Ellis report rental data to assess whether CS Wind Malaysia's government property lease was for adequate remuneration, and continued to deny the company's requested entered-value adjustment because two of four examined transactions lacked Customs Form 7501 or other customs documentation and the other two invoices did not match the entered values on the Forms 7501. Commerce made no change to CS Wind's subsidy rate.

Oct 10Sat
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains in part and remands in part Commerce's remand redetermination in ninth CVD review of multilayered wood flooring from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-124, sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's remand redetermination in the ninth administrative review of the countervailing duty order on multilayered wood flooring from China for the January 1 through December 31, 2019 period of review. The court reviewed Commerce's use of UN Comtrade and ITTO Peru data in the face and backboard veneer benchmarks and the plywood benchmark, and its use of adverse facts available to find certain of Baroque's input suppliers to be government authorities. The opinion is dated October 9, 2026, in Consol. Court No. 22-00210 before Judge Timothy M. Reif.

Sep 23Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce remand results in AD/CVD reviews of wood mouldings and millwork from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's final results of redetermination on remand in the countervailing and antidumping duty administrative reviews of wood mouldings and millwork products from China, in China Cornici Co. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-118, Court Nos. 23-00216 and 23-00217, decided September 23, 2026. On remand Commerce declined to rescind the reviews and assigned China Cornici and RaoPing the 8.89% countervailing duty rate for non-examined companies for the 2021 period of review, and assigned China Cornici the China-wide antidumping duty rate of 220.87% while allowing Chen Chiu to claim RaoPing's 0.00% separate cash deposit rate for future shipments.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's first administrative review of the antidumping order on mobile access equipment from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustains Commerce's determination in the first administrative review of the antidumping duty order on mobile access equipment from China, in Slip Op. 26-119, Court No. 24-00219 and Court No. 24-00221. The court found Commerce's determination supported by substantial evidence and otherwise in accordance with law, rejecting Dingli's challenge to the selection of Turkey as the primary surrogate country and the Coalition's challenge to the use of Bulgaria as a secondary surrogate country.

Sep 15Tue
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce remand results in Ditar, S.A. v. United States paper bag antidumping case

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained the Department of Commerce's remand results in Ditar, S.A. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-114, Court No. 24-00130, an antidumping duty investigation of paper bags from Colombia. The court held that substantial evidence supported Commerce's finding that Ditar failed to establish that its home-market sales to distributors and end users were made at different levels of trade, because its warehousing and repacking expenses were reported as indirect selling expenses and could not corroborate the claimed intensity differences.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's fourth remand redetermination in welded line pipe investigation on Korea

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's fourth remand redetermination in the 2015 less-than-fair-value investigation of welded line pipe from the Republic of Korea, in Stupp Corp. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-113, Consol. Court No. 15-00334, dated September 15, 2026. On remand Commerce replaced the Cohen's d test with a two-percent price difference test to determine whether prices differ significantly, and abandoned its mixed methodology in applying its ratio test. The court held the price difference test reasonable and found Commerce acted within the scope of remand.

Sep 14Mon
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains in part and remands in part Commerce's 2022-23 AD review of glycine from India

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-112, Court No. 25-00081, sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's final determination in the 2022-23 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from India, covering June 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023. The case was brought by Kumar Industries and Bajaj Healthcare Limited; Deer Park Glycine, LLC was defendant-intervenor. Commerce had applied facts otherwise available with an adverse inference to Kumar and assigned Bajaj, a non-selected respondent, the simple average of Kumar's and Avid Organics' dumping margins.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's second remand redetermination in light-walled rectangular pipe and tube review from Mexico

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's Second Remand Redetermination in the 2020-2021 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from Mexico, in which Commerce replaced the Cohen's d test with a new price difference test after the CAFC's decision in Marmen III. The revised analysis produced weighted-average dumping margins of 10.67% for Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. and Tecnicas de Fluidos S.A. de C.V. and 6.06% for non-selected parties such as Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V., replacing the amended final results margins of 9.2% and 5.32%. The opinion is Slip Op. 26-111 in Consol. Court No. 23-00091, dated September 14, 2026.

Sep 4Fri
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT remands Commerce's final results in steel racks antidumping review for reconsideration of differential pricing methodology

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-108, Court No. 25-00175, remanded for reconsideration Commerce's final results in the 2022-2023 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain steel racks from China, 90 Fed. Reg. 30,629, which assigned Jiangsu Nova a margin of 11.18% ad valorem. The court granted Commerce's request for a voluntary remand so it can allow parties to comment on the new differential pricing methodology, including the price difference test and ratio test, that replaced the Cohen's d test after Marmen. Commerce has 90 days to submit its remand redetermination, with comments to follow under Rule 56.2(h).

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce remand results in wind towers AD review of Dongkuk S&C

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's remand results in the antidumping duty administrative review of utility scale wind towers from the Republic of Korea, Slip Op. 26-104, Court No. 24-00070, in an opinion by Judge Leo M. Gordon dated September 4, 2026. On remand Commerce reconsidered Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd.'s indirect conversion costs, found its reported methodology distortive, and recalculated the weight-average dumping margin to 1.90 percent. The court sustained Commerce's use of period-of-review annual average costs over Dongkuk's reported indirect conversion costs.

  3. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains remand redetermination in Catfish Farmers of America v. United States

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained the Final Results of Redetermination pursuant to Court Remand (Apr. 15, 2026) in Catfish Farmers of America v. United States, Slip Op. 26-103, Court No. 24-00082, finding it complies with the court's order in Catfish Farmers of Am. v. United States, 49 CIT __, 815 Fed. Supp. 3d 1339 (2025), including its statement that the allegation identified a ministerial error. No party commented in opposition, and the United States asked the court to sustain the results. The court ordered that entries affected by this action be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision in this litigation.

Aug 19Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's second remand redetermination in UAE circular welded steel pipe review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's Second Remand Redetermination in the 2020-2021 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe from the United Arab Emirates, Slip Op. 26-98, Court No. 23-00113. On remand following the CAFC's decision in Marmen III, 134 F.4th 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2025), Commerce discontinued the Cohen's d test and applied a new three-step differential pricing analysis, revising Universal Tube and Plastic Industries' weighted-average dumping margin from 2.63% to 3.64%. The court also accepted Commerce's explanation for applying both the inter-quarter and same-quarter comparisons in the same review.

Aug 14Fri
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT denies reconsideration in Tianjin Magnesium AD review of pure magnesium from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade denied Tianjin Magnesium International Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd.'s motion for reconsideration in Court No. 25-00002, Slip Op. 26-96, issued August 14, 2026. The motion challenged the court's March 13, 2026 opinion and order in Tianjin Magnesium I, which sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's final results of the antidumping duty administrative review of pure magnesium from China for the period May 1, 2022, through April 30, 2023. The court found the plaintiffs misread its earlier opinion, conflating Bulgarian export data with production data, and that they failed to show reconsideration was necessary.

Aug 13Thu
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT denies Chattem intervention in glycine changed circumstances review appeal

    The U.S. Court of International Trade denied Chattem Chemicals, Inc.'s motion to intervene in Salvi Chemical Industries Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 26-02569, Slip Op. 26-93, an action challenging Commerce's final results of the antidumping duty changed circumstances review of the glycine order from China, 91 Fed. Reg. 10,588. The court held Chattem was an interested party as a domestic glycine producer but was not a party to the changed circumstances review, having entered its appearance on June 3, 2026, and that permissive intervention is unavailable in actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c); its June 22, 2026 motion was also untimely.

Aug 12Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's second remand redetermination in phosphate fertilizers countervailing duty review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's second remand redetermination in the countervailing duty administrative review of phosphate fertilizers from the Russian Federation, in Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-92, Consol. Court No. 23-00239, issued August 12, 2026. Commerce reconstructed its tier-three benchmark to include world sedimentary-origin phosphate rock price data from Iran and Togo that had previously been excluded solely on the distinction between igneous and sedimentary ore, and calculated that JSC Apatit received no measurable benefit for the provision of mining rights for less than adequate remuneration, resulting in a total subsidy rate of 22.86 percent ad valorem for the period of review.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT denies ADM motion to complete administrative record in consolidated phosphate case

    The U.S. Court of International Trade denied Archer Daniels Midland Company's motion to complete the administrative record in Consolidated Court No. 23-00239, Slip Op. 26-91, dated August 12, 2026. ADM sought to add its March 30, 2026, Rebuttal Comments in Response to The Mosaic Company's Submission of New Factual Information, which were not in the record because ADM's counsel E-filed them under the first administrative review proceeding rather than the second remand proceeding, so Commerce did not consider them in the remand redetermination.

Aug 11Tue
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT remands Commerce's CVD review determination on Korean cut-to-length steel plate

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-90, Consol. Court No. 24-00190, granted motions for judgment on the agency record filed by Hyundai Steel Company, Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. and the Government of the Republic of Korea and remanded Commerce's final results in the 2022 countervailing duty administrative review of certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate from the Republic of Korea for further explanation or reconsideration.

Jul 29Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains in part and remands in part Commerce's final results in AD review on activated carbon from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's amended final results in the 2022-2023 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain activated carbon from China, Consol. Court No. 24-00262, Slip Op. 26-84, dated July 29, 2026. The court found Commerce's selection of Malaysia as the primary surrogate country unsupported and remanded that issue. The amended final results, at 89 Fed. Reg. 104,978, calculated weighted-average dumping margins of $1.90/kg for Jilin Bright, $1.10/kg for GHC and $1.35/kg for non-selected companies under review.

Jul 22Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT denies Bridgestone's challenge to Commerce's total adverse facts available determination in truck and bus tires from Thailand

    The U.S. Court of International Trade denied Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC's motion for judgment on the agency record and sustained Commerce's final determination in the antidumping duty investigation of truck and bus tires from Thailand, 89 Fed. Reg. 83636 (Oct. 17, 2024). In Slip Op. 26-79, Court No. 24-00263, Judge Gary S. Katzmann found that Commerce's application of total adverse facts available was supported by substantial evidence because the errors in Bridgestone's reporting were pervasive, and that Commerce lawfully corroborated Bridgestone's dumping margin. The court sustained the Final Determination.

Jul 21Tue
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's fourth remand results in softwood lumber CVD expedited review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's fourth remand results in the countervailing duty expedited review of certain softwood lumber products from Canada, in Consol. Court No. 19-00122, Slip Op. 26-77, dated July 21, 2026. On remand Commerce reopened the record, netted out C$5,317,890 from the category "Lumber (Unaffiliated Canadian Suppliers) - Resold," and revised D&G/Portbec's overall subsidy rate down to 1.05 percent from 1.75 percent, still above de minimis. The court also upheld Commerce's refusal to deduct secondary processing costs for remanufactured lumber, finding the argument forfeited.

Jul 17Fri
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's third remand results in Saha Thai steel pipe AD review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's Third Remand Results in the 2019-2020 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand, holding that Commerce's application of an adverse inference to the affiliation determination between Saha Thai Steel Pipe Public Company Limited and its home-market customer BNK Steel Co. Ltd. is supported by substantial evidence and in accordance with law. The case is Saha Thai Steel Pipe Pub. Co. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-76, Court No. 21-00627, decided July 17, 2026. The underlying review is the final determination published at 86 Fed. Reg. 69620.

Jul 14Tue
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains in part and remands in part Commerce's chlorinated isocyanurates review from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's final results in the antidumping duty administrative review of chlorinated isocyanurates from China for the period June 1, 2022, through May 31, 2023, in Bio-Lab, Inc. v. United States, Court No. 25-00054, Slip Op. 26-74. The court upheld Commerce's determination that Mexico was not at the same level of economic development as China during the period of review and remanded on whether chlorinated isos are unusual or unique merchandise under Policy Bulletin 04.1 and whether calcium hypochlorite and sodium hypochlorite are comparable merchandise for surrogate country selection.

Jun 29Mon
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains in part and remands in part Commerce's second remand redetermination in fluid end blocks review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's second remand redetermination in the less-than-fair-value investigation of forged steel fluid end blocks from Germany, in Ellwood City Forge Co. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-69, Consol. Court No. 21-0007. BGH Edelstahl Siegen GmbH asked the court to reject Commerce's particular market situation adjustments for subsidized electricity rates and imported ferrochrome inputs, and Ellwood asked the court to reject Commerce's construction of 19 U.S.C. § 1677b(f)(1)(A) and to remand for reconsideration of that pathway. The court sustained in part and remanded in part the second remand redetermination.

Jun 23Tue
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT remands Commerce's final determination in ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan AD investigation

    The U.S. Court of International Trade remanded Commerce's final determination in the 2023 antidumping investigation of ferrosilicon from Kazakhstan, Slip Op. 26-68, Court No. 25-00100, dated June 23, 2026. The court addressed YDD Corporation's challenges to Commerce's inclusion of sales destined for Canada in its dumping margin calculation, its application of partial adverse facts available, its use of zeroing, and its AFA-based margin calculation, and TNC Kazchrome's challenge to Commerce's selection of the shipment date as the date of sale. The opinion does not state the remand results or any revised rates.

  2. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce remand redetermination in AD review of steel racks from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's remand redetermination in the antidumping duty administrative review of certain steel racks from China for the September 1, 2021 through August 31, 2022 period of review, in Nanjing Dongsheng Shelf Manufacturing Co. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-67, Court No. 24-00085. On remand Commerce accepted Nanjing Dongsheng's Separate Rate Certification, treated the company as a mandatory respondent and assigned it a 25% weighted-average dumping margin. The court held that Nanjing waived its challenge to Commerce's denial of a scrap offset because it failed to exhaust its administrative remedies by not raising the issue during the remand proceeding.

Jun 16Tue
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's denial of double remedies adjustment in aluminum foil review from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's remand redetermination denying Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd. and affiliated plaintiffs a double remedies adjustment under 19 U.S.C. § 1677f-1(f)(1) in the 2021–2022 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on aluminum foil from China. In Slip Op. 26-63, Court No. 23-00264, Judge Claire R. Kelly held that Commerce's finding that Dingsheng provided insufficient evidence of a subsidy-to-cost link and a cost-to-price link is supported by substantial evidence, and that 19 U.S.C. § 1677m(d) did not require Commerce to give notice of deficiencies in the Double Remedies Questionnaire Response.

Jun 12Fri
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's amended final results in seventh AD review of passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade denied Giti Tire Global Trading Pte. Ltd. and affiliates Giti Radial Tire (Anhui) Company Ltd. and Giti Tire (Fujian) Company Ltd.'s motion for judgment on the agency record and sustained Commerce's amended final results in the seventh administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain passenger vehicle and light truck tires from China, covering August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022 (Slip Op. 26-61, Court No. 24-00083, dated June 12, 2026).

May 22Fri
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce remand redetermination in AD review of nickel-plated steel from Japan

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's final remand redetermination in the antidumping duty administrative review of diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated flat-rolled steel products from Japan for the period May 1, 2022, through April 30, 2023, in Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 24-00261, Slip Op. 26-54. On remand Commerce continued to use the shipment date as the date of sale and discontinued its Cohen's d test, applying the price difference test instead; Toyo Kohan's estimated weighted-average dumping margin increased from 4.44 percent to 4.58 percent.

May 18Mon
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT remands Commerce's de facto specificity finding in Hyundai Steel CVD review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-52, Court No. 23-00211, remanded Commerce's second redetermination in the 2021 administrative review of the countervailing duty order on certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate from the Republic of Korea, holding that Commerce's finding that the electricity subsidy Hyundai Steel received was de facto specific under 19 U.S.C. § 1677(5A)(D)(iii)(III) is unsupported by substantial evidence. Commerce had found the Electricity Program specific because Hyundai's share of industrial-class electricity consumption exceeded its contribution to Korea's 2021 GDP. The court ordered further consideration on remand.

May 14Thu
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains Commerce's final results in quartz surface products reviews from China

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's final results in the 2021–2023 antidumping duty administrative review and the 2021–2022 countervailing duty administrative review of certain quartz surface products from China, in AM Stone & Cabinets, Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-50, Court No. 24-00241, decided May 14, 2026. The reviews concerned whether exporter Universal Quartz remained eligible to certify that its quartz surface products are not produced from Chinese-origin quartz slab; Commerce found it ineligible and assigned it the China-wide AD rate and the all-others rate in the CVD review.

May 12Tue
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains second remand results assigning zero dumping margin to Fufeng and Meihua in xanthan gum review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's Second Remand Results in Consol. Court No. 23-00068, the 2020-2021 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on xanthan gum from China (88 Fed. Reg. 9861). On remand, Commerce found HTS 2701.19 to be the proper subheading for valuing Fufeng's coal factor of production and calculated a revised dumping margin of zero percent for Neimenggu Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Shandong Fufeng Fermentation Co. and Xinjiang Fufeng Biotechnologies Co.; Meihua Group International (Hong Kong) Limited and Xinjiang Meihua Amino Acid Co., Ltd. had their separate rate recalculated to zero percent because it was based on Fufeng's weighted-average margin.

May 11Mon
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT denies motion to backdate statutory injunction in Vietnamese honey antidumping case

    The U.S. Court of International Trade denied a motion by Bao Nguyen Honeybee Co., Ltd. and eight other Vietnamese exporters to amend the statutory injunction in Court No. 25-00085 nunc pro tunc so that it would be effective as of August 8, 2025, the date they first moved for an injunction. The court held that the Federal Circuit's Agro Dutch exception does not apply because the liquidation at issue is alleged to have occurred before the injunction was entered, not during a post-entry grace period, and the plaintiff-intervenors did not show that the parties or the court intended the injunction to cover entries liquidated before it took effect.

May 6Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT dismisses Aloha Pencil challenge to Commerce rescission of 2023–2024 cased pencils review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade granted the government's motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction in Aloha Pencil Company, LLC v. United States, Slip Op. 26-46, Court No. 25-00102, an opinion and order dated May 6, 2026. Aloha Pencil had challenged Commerce's rescission of the 2023–2024 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain cased pencils from China, 90 Fed. Reg. 19,268 (May 7, 2025). The court found Aloha Pencil made no factual allegations in its complaint to support its claim to be a manufacturer, producer or wholesaler of the domestic like product.

Apr 28Tue
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains in part and remands in part Commerce's final results in FEB AD review on Italy

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-44 dated April 28, 2026, sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's final results in the antidumping duty administrative review of forged steel fluid end blocks from Italy for the period July 23, 2020, through December 31, 2021, published at 88 Fed. Reg. 55,010. The court addressed Commerce's choice of constructed value SG&A expense and profit data and its valuation of a major input purchased from an affiliated supplier. The case is Ellwood City Forge Co. v. United States, Court No. 23-00191, before Judge Timothy M. Reif.

Apr 27Mon
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains in part and remands in part Commerce's remand redetermination in chlorinated isocyanurates review

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's remand redetermination in the administrative review of the antidumping order on chlorinated isocyanurates from China for the period June 1, 2021, through May 31, 2022, in Bio-Lab, Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-43, Consol. Court No. 24-00024. The court had found in Bio-Lab I that Commerce failed to adequately explain its determination that cyanuric acid is not a major input, its comparable-merchandise findings on calcium hypochlorite and sodium hypochlorite, and its selection of Romanian labor data as the surrogate value for labor.