Commerce determines that imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from Indonesia are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value, with a final affirmative determination of critical circumstances, applicable September 16, 2026. The period of investigation is July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025. The notice does not state the cash deposit rates.
Why it matters: Importers of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from Indonesia face the final LTFV determination applicable September 16, 2026, with critical circumstances found.
Federal Register · Commerce ITA (AD/CVD)Top PickAI score82
Commerce determines that crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from the Lao People's Democratic Republic are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value, with a final affirmative determination of critical circumstances, in part. The period of investigation is January 1, 2025, through June 30, 2025, and the determination is applicable September 16, 2026. The notice does not state the cash deposit rates.
Commerce issued final results in the 2024-2025 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on sodium nitrite from India, determining that certain producers/exporters made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review from February 1, 2024, through January 31, 2025, and rescinding the review with respect to certain companies. The results are applicable September 16, 2026. The notice does not state the cash deposit rates or name the companies covered by the rescission.
Commerce issued a final affirmative countervailing duty determination finding that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from India, for the period of investigation April 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025, applicable September 16, 2026. Commerce also made a final affirmative critical circumstances determination, in part. The notice does not state the cash deposit rates.
The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained the Department of Commerce's remand results in Ditar, S.A. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-114, Court No. 24-00130, an antidumping duty investigation of paper bags from Colombia. The court held that substantial evidence supported Commerce's finding that Ditar failed to establish that its home-market sales to distributors and end users were made at different levels of trade, because its warehousing and repacking expenses were reported as indirect selling expenses and could not corroborate the claimed intensity differences.
The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's fourth remand redetermination in the 2015 less-than-fair-value investigation of welded line pipe from the Republic of Korea, in Stupp Corp. v. United States, Slip Op. 26-113, Consol. Court No. 15-00334, dated September 15, 2026. On remand Commerce replaced the Cohen's d test with a two-percent price difference test to determine whether prices differ significantly, and abandoned its mixed methodology in applying its ratio test. The court held the price difference test reasonable and found Commerce acted within the scope of remand.
Commerce determines in the final results of the 2023 countervailing duty administrative review that countervailable subsidies were not provided to SeAH Steel Corporation, a producer and exporter of oil country tubular goods from the Republic of Korea, for the period January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. Commerce is rescinding the review with respect to Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. The results are applicable September 15, 2026.
Commerce issued the final results of its antidumping duty administrative review of glycine from India, determining that producers and/or exporters subject to the review made sales of subject merchandise below normal value during the period of review from June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025. The final results apply September 15, 2026, and follow the preliminary results published at 91 FR 27262. The notice does not state the cash deposit rates or the individual companies covered.
Commerce preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of tin mill products from the People's Republic of China, with the period of investigation January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025, applicable September 15, 2026. Commerce also made a preliminary affirmative critical circumstances determination and aligned the final countervailing duty determination with the final antidumping duty determination. Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary determination.
Commerce preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies were provided to Borusan Birleşik Boru Fabrikalari Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. (Borusan), a producer and exporter of certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from the Republic of Türkiye, in the countervailing duty administrative review covering the period January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The preliminary results are applicable September 15, 2026, and interested parties are invited to comment. Commerce preliminarily finds BMB Holding A.Ş. and Borusan Holding A.S. to be cross-owned with Borusan.
Commerce determined in the final results of the 2023-2024 antidumping duty administrative review of certain steel racks and parts thereof from China that the exporters under review either sold at prices below normal value during the period September 1, 2023, through August 31, 2024, or did not establish eligibility for a separate rate and remain part of the China-wide entity. The notice applies September 15, 2026, and rescinds the review in part. The China-wide entity includes Guangdong Xinmiao Storage Equipment Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Kingmore Storage Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Starshine Industry Equipment Co., Ltd. and Nanjing Peter Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd.
Why it matters: The final results set the liquidation rate for reviewed entries of certain steel racks and parts thereof from China during the September 1, 2023, through August 31, 2024 period, and the notice does not state the cash deposit rates.
Federal Register · Commerce ITA (AD/CVD)Top PickAI score62
Commerce is publishing a notice continuing the antidumping duty orders on silicon metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland and Malaysia and the countervailing duty order on silicon metal from the Republic of Kazakhstan, after Commerce and the ITC determined that revocation would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies and material injury. The continuation is applicable September 3, 2026. The orders were first published at 86 FR 20364, 86 FR 20365 and 86 FR 46677, and the ITC's determination appeared at 91 FR 56670.
Why it matters: Importers of silicon metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, Malaysia and Kazakhstan remain subject to the existing AD and CVD orders, with the continuation applicable as of September 3, 2026.
Federal Register · Commerce ITA (AD/CVD)AI score50
Commerce determines in the final results of its countervailing duty administrative review that countervailable subsidies were provided to Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC (OARC), a producer and exporter of certain aluminum foil from the Sultanate of Oman, during the period of review January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. The final results are applicable September 15, 2026, and follow the preliminary results published at 91 FR 27017. Commerce found OARC cross-owned with Sohar Paper Cores LLC, Takamul Investment Company LLC, and OQ SAOC. The notice does not state the cash deposit rates.
The USITC determined that a U.S. industry is materially injured by reason of imports of steel concrete reinforcing bar from Bulgaria, Egypt and Vietnam, provided for in HTSUS 7213.10.00, 7214.20.00 and 7228.30.80, that Commerce found to be sold at less than fair value and, for Egypt and Vietnam, subsidized. The determinations were made under section 735(b) of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) in Investigation Nos. 701-TA-769-770 and 731-TA-1752-1754 (Final) and filed on September 11, 2026. Commissioners Thanhauser and Foley did not participate.
Why it matters: The affirmative injury determinations cover rebar from Bulgaria, Egypt and Vietnam classified in HTSUS 7213.10.00, 7214.20.00 and 7228.30.80, clearing the way for AD/CVD orders on those entries.
The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-112, Court No. 25-00081, sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's final determination in the 2022-23 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from India, covering June 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023. The case was brought by Kumar Industries and Bajaj Healthcare Limited; Deer Park Glycine, LLC was defendant-intervenor. Commerce had applied facts otherwise available with an adverse inference to Kumar and assigned Bajaj, a non-selected respondent, the simple average of Kumar's and Avid Organics' dumping margins.
The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's Second Remand Redetermination in the 2020-2021 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from Mexico, in which Commerce replaced the Cohen's d test with a new price difference test after the CAFC's decision in Marmen III. The revised analysis produced weighted-average dumping margins of 10.67% for Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. and Tecnicas de Fluidos S.A. de C.V. and 6.06% for non-selected parties such as Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V., replacing the amended final results margins of 9.2% and 5.32%. The opinion is Slip Op. 26-111 in Consol. Court No. 23-00091, dated September 14, 2026.
The USITC gives notice of the institution of preliminary-phase antidumping and countervailing duty investigations Nos. 701-TA-806 and 731-TA-1805-1807 into imports of corrugated pizza boxes from China, Malaysia and Turkey, provided for in subheading 4819.10.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value and alleged to be subsidized by the Government of Turkey. The Commission must reach a preliminary determination by October 26, 2026, unless Commerce extends the time for initiation, and must transmit its views to Commerce by November 2, 2026. The notice is dated September 9, 2026.
Commerce preliminarily determines that Cuarzo and Beyyond Rocks Private Limited, treated as a single entity, made sales of certain quartz surface products from India at less than normal value during the June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025 review period, and that Pokarna Engineered Stone Limited did not. Commerce is rescinding the review for 53 companies and intends to rescind it for four companies. The results are applicable September 14, 2026, and interested parties may comment.
Commerce preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies were provided to producers and exporters of glycine from India in the countervailing duty administrative review for the period January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024, applicable September 14, 2026. Commerce is also rescinding the review, in part, with respect to 27 companies. Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results.
Commerce preliminarily determines that NEXCO S.A., Villamora S.A. and the non-individually-examined companies for which a review was requested made sales of raw honey from Argentina at less than normal value during the period of review, June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025. The preliminary results apply September 14, 2026, and interested parties are invited to comment. The notice does not state the preliminary margins.
Commerce determines in the final results of its 2023-2024 administrative review that Adisseo España S.A., the sole producer and exporter subject to the review, made sales of methionine from Spain at less than normal value during the period of review from September 1, 2023, through August 31, 2024. The final results are applicable September 14, 2026. The notice does not state the cash deposit rate or the weighted-average dumping margin.
Commerce preliminarily determines that exporters subject to the antidumping duty administrative review of raw honey from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam made sales below normal value during the period of review, June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025, and rescinds the review with respect to 17 companies. The notice applies September 14, 2026, and interested parties may comment on the preliminary results. The notice does not state the preliminary dumping margins or the cash deposit rates.
Commerce preliminarily determines in the 2024-2025 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on raw honey from Brazil that Melbras Importadora E Exportadora Agroindústria Ltda. and Minamel Agroindústria Ltda. made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review, June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2025, and is rescinding the review with respect to 11 companies. The results are applicable September 14, 2026, and interested parties are invited to comment. The notice does not state the preliminary dumping margins or cash deposit rates.
The USITC gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of antidumping and countervailing duty investigations Nos. 701-TA-783-784 and 731-TA-1771-1772 (Final) on citric acid and certain citrate salts provided for in HTS subheadings 2918.14.00, 2918.15.10, 2918.15.50 and 3824.99.93. The injury phase covers imports from China preliminarily determined by Commerce to be subsidized and sold at less-than-fair-value, and imports from Canada preliminarily determined to be subsidized but not, or not likely to be, sold at less-than-fair-value. The notice is dated August 26, 2026.
Executive Order 14425 of September 4, 2026 directs the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of the Interior, the U.S. Trade Representative, the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to submit a report to the President within 90 days assessing agency regulations, guidance and policies affecting ranchers and recommending action on financial viability and market access.
The USITC gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of antidumping investigation No. 731-TA-1770 (Final) on fresh winter strawberries from Mexico, provided for in subheading 0810.10.40 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, preliminarily determined by Commerce to be sold in the United States at less-than-fair-value. The Commission will determine whether a U.S. industry is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry is materially retarded, by reason of those imports. The notice lists August 21, 2026.
The USITC determined that a U.S. industry is materially injured by reason of imports of hardwood and decorative plywood (excluding all softwood structural plywood) from China, Indonesia and Vietnam, provided for in HTS subheadings 4412.10.05, 4412.31.06, 4412.31.26, 4412.31.42, 4412.31.45, 4412.31.48, 4412.31.52, 4412.31.61, 4412.31.92, 4412.33.06, 4412.33.26, 4412.33.32, 4412.33.57, 4412.34.26, 4412.34.32, 4412.34.57, 4412.39.40, 4412.39.50, 4412.41.00, 4412.42.00, 4412.51.10, 4412.51.31, 4412.51.41, 4412.51.51, 4412.52.10, 4412.52.31, 4412.52.41, 4412.91.06, 4412.91.10, 4412.91.31, 4412.91.41, 4412.92.07, 4412.92.11, 4412.92.31 and 4412.92.42, found by Commerce to be sold at less than fair value and subsidized.
Why it matters: Importers of hardwood and decorative plywood from China, Indonesia and Vietnam covered by the listed HTS subheadings now face affirmative injury determinations in the final phase of the AD/CVD investigations, while the softwood structural plywood investigations were terminated on negligibility grounds.
The USITC determined that a U.S. industry is materially injured by reason of imports of L-lysine from China, provided for in subheading 2922.41.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that Commerce found sold at less than fair value and subsidized by the government of China. The determinations were made under sections 705(b) and 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) and 19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) in Investigation Nos. 701-TA-767 and 731-TA-1750 (Final), and the Commission filed them on September 2, 2026; its views are in USITC Publication 5783 (September 2026).
The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-108, Court No. 25-00175, remanded for reconsideration Commerce's final results in the 2022-2023 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain steel racks from China, 90 Fed. Reg. 30,629, which assigned Jiangsu Nova a margin of 11.18% ad valorem. The court granted Commerce's request for a voluntary remand so it can allow parties to comment on the new differential pricing methodology, including the price difference test and ratio test, that replaced the Cohen's d test after Marmen. Commerce has 90 days to submit its remand redetermination, with comments to follow under Rule 56.2(h).
The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's remand results in the antidumping duty administrative review of utility scale wind towers from the Republic of Korea, Slip Op. 26-104, Court No. 24-00070, in an opinion by Judge Leo M. Gordon dated September 4, 2026. On remand Commerce reconsidered Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd.'s indirect conversion costs, found its reported methodology distortive, and recalculated the weight-average dumping margin to 1.90 percent. The court sustained Commerce's use of period-of-review annual average costs over Dongkuk's reported indirect conversion costs.
The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained the International Trade Commission's affirmative material-injury determination in the countervailing duty investigation of frozen warmwater shrimp from India, in Slip Op. 26-106, Court No. 25-00031, dated September 4, 2026. The court rejected the Seafood Exporters Association of India's challenges that the Commission wrongly defined the domestic like product to include frozen cooked shrimp alongside raw shrimp and that imports filled a supply gap the domestic industry could not serve. The investigation covered frozen warmwater shrimp, wild-caught and farmed, cooked and raw, for the period January 1, 2021, to March 31, 2024.
The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained the Final Results of Redetermination pursuant to Court Remand (Apr. 15, 2026) in Catfish Farmers of America v. United States, Slip Op. 26-103, Court No. 24-00082, finding it complies with the court's order in Catfish Farmers of Am. v. United States, 49 CIT __, 815 Fed. Supp. 3d 1339 (2025), including its statement that the allegation identified a ministerial error. No party commented in opposition, and the United States asked the court to sustain the results. The court ordered that entries affected by this action be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision in this litigation.
The USITC determines there is a reasonable indication that a U.S. industry is materially injured by reason of imports of welded stainless steel line and pressure pipe from India, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates, provided for in HTS subheadings 7305.31.60, 7306.11.00 and 7306.40.50, alleged to be sold at less than fair value and, for India and Turkey, alleged to be subsidized. The investigations are AD/CVD Nos. 701-TA-800-801 and 731-TA-1796-1798 (Preliminary), instituted July 15, 2026, with the Commission's views in USITC Publication 5789. The Commission also gives notice of the commencement of the final phase of the investigations.
The U.S. Court of International Trade denied as moot the plaintiffs' motion to enforce the settlement agreement in Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Lutnick, Court No. 24-00148, Slip Op. 26-97, dated August 19, 2026, after all parties agreed no live controversy remained. The court noted that the Marine Mammal Protection Act import provisions, 16 U.S.C. § 1371(a)(2), have been implemented for the first time since the MMPA's 1972 enactment, with comparability findings issued for 135 nations covering approximately 2,500 fisheries and import bans on fish caught with commercial fishing technology causing incidental kill or serious injury of ocean mammals in excess of U.S. standards.
The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained Commerce's Second Remand Redetermination in the 2020-2021 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe from the United Arab Emirates, Slip Op. 26-98, Court No. 23-00113. On remand following the CAFC's decision in Marmen III, 134 F.4th 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2025), Commerce discontinued the Cohen's d test and applied a new three-step differential pricing analysis, revising Universal Tube and Plastic Industries' weighted-average dumping margin from 2.63% to 3.64%. The court also accepted Commerce's explanation for applying both the inter-quarter and same-quarter comparisons in the same review.
The U.S. Court of International Trade denied Tianjin Magnesium International Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd.'s motion for reconsideration in Court No. 25-00002, Slip Op. 26-96, issued August 14, 2026. The motion challenged the court's March 13, 2026 opinion and order in Tianjin Magnesium I, which sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's final results of the antidumping duty administrative review of pure magnesium from China for the period May 1, 2022, through April 30, 2023. The court found the plaintiffs misread its earlier opinion, conflating Bulgarian export data with production data, and that they failed to show reconsideration was necessary.
The U.S. Court of International Trade held in Slip Op. 26-94, Court No. 25-00091, that IEEPA's authority to "nullify [or] void . . . exercising any . . . privilege" authorizes the President's rescission of the de minimis exemption under 19 U.S.C. § 1321, and that the APA does not apply to the ministerial agency actions implementing that directive. The court denied Axle of Dearborn's motion for partial summary judgment on Counts I and II, granted summary judgment to the government on those counts, denied the government's motion to dismiss Count II as moot, and denied the government's motion for summary judgment on Count III.
Why it matters: The decision leaves the rescission of duty-free de minimis treatment for goods valued under $800 in place as to the claims decided, while Count III of Axle's amended complaint remains unresolved.