Skip to content

#India

0 items today
Sep 14Mon
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains in part and remands in part Commerce's 2022-23 AD review of glycine from India

    The U.S. Court of International Trade, in Slip Op. 26-112, Court No. 25-00081, sustained in part and remanded in part Commerce's final determination in the 2022-23 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from India, covering June 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023. The case was brought by Kumar Industries and Bajaj Healthcare Limited; Deer Park Glycine, LLC was defendant-intervenor. Commerce had applied facts otherwise available with an adverse inference to Kumar and assigned Bajaj, a non-selected respondent, the simple average of Kumar's and Avid Organics' dumping margins.

Sep 4Fri
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT sustains ITC material-injury finding on subsidized frozen warmwater shrimp from India

    The U.S. Court of International Trade sustained the International Trade Commission's affirmative material-injury determination in the countervailing duty investigation of frozen warmwater shrimp from India, in Slip Op. 26-106, Court No. 25-00031, dated September 4, 2026. The court rejected the Seafood Exporters Association of India's challenges that the Commission wrongly defined the domestic like product to include frozen cooked shrimp alongside raw shrimp and that imports filled a supply gap the domestic industry could not serve. The investigation covered frozen warmwater shrimp, wild-caught and farmed, cooked and raw, for the period January 1, 2021, to March 31, 2024.

Jul 1Wed
  1. CIT · Slip Opinions

    CIT remands Commerce's final determination on brass rod from India over cost adjustments

    The U.S. Court of International Trade granted plaintiffs' motion for judgment on the agency record in American Brass Rod Fair Trade Coalition v. United States, Slip Op. 26-70, Court No. 24-00119, and remanded Commerce's final affirmative less-than-fair-value determination on brass rod from India for further consideration and explanation of adjustments relating to Rajhans Metals Private Limited's cost of manufacturing. The court found Commerce did not reasonably address concerns about the work-in-progress inventory adjustment and the scrap offset methodology. The remand concerns the final determination published at 89 Fed. Reg. 29,300.